Prophecy and Prophetic Evidence Is A Key

Solid Rock-Sinking Sand Series continues - Section 1 Chapter 12

Prophecy and Prophetic evidence is a key

II Peter 1: 20 - 21

"Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." (Emphasis mine)

Prophecy that includes future predictions pronounced by the LORD is one marked difference between holy and counterfeit writings. Satan is not omniscient knowing the end from the beginning like God. He can only mimic real prophecy and attempt to orchestrate its fulfillment using false prophets. There have been many throughout history.

Nostradamus, the French mystic, is one that most people are acquainted with by way of one clear example. He was the French physician and astrologer who wrote Centuries (1555), a book of prophecies. His track record is impressive by man’s standards, but he is a false prophet by God’s. The LORD requires 100% accuracy. No margin for error is tolerated. A false prophet was to be destroyed by stoning to protect the Israelites from error and deception from the "god of this world", Satan-Lucifer. Nostradamus would have been judged and executed had he lived during one of Israel’s great times of obedience and spiritual victory such as in the days of Joshua.

The unholy prophets like Nostradamus have often exhibited numerous failures to accurately predict future events. They are often found guilty of outright lies from the spirit world that can later be denounced. This is completely unacceptable according to God’s words. Perfection is required. It is the only acceptable standard for the pronouncements of true prophets uttering predictive prophecies in God’s name.

Should not the LORD’s holy word be held to these same high standards? If found to be in serious error compared to the safe and trusted historic text of the AV, the "bible" in question should be destroyed! Today in our "civilized" society, book burning is considered passé. We should, at the very least, abandon these bibles to the trash heap, or mark them in our libraries as defective and dangerous. If we keep them at all, we should use them only to show people the errors in comparison to the pure real bibles.

Meanwhile we watch the text critics burn our pure bibles, word by word, letter by letter until it serves Satan’s purpose of ultimately leading to his ecumenical, one world bible that will support his kingdom and his false Christ (the Anti-Christ).

Muslims riot and demonstrate when they learn of someone desecrating or changing their Koran. Most of us Christians would remain passive and not even verbally issue a protest when we see men changing and blaspheming God’s words! How sad, but the problem goes much deeper.

There is much textual material not in our bibles that certain groups are pushing to have added and treated as scripture. This move is coming from the most outspoken liberal scholars that tend to have New Age leanings in their religious philosophy and world view. They read portions of the text of the manuscripts Codex Sinaiticus (Aleph) and Codex Vaticanus (B). These false teachings resonate with their hearts which have been corrupted by pagan mysticism and Satan’s doctrinal perversions. The spurious books within these Codices shockingly even support Satan’s agenda for the kingdom of his coming world ruler and false Christ. The great imitator, Lucifer-Satan wants to copy the LORD at every turn including having his own false "bible" that supports his agenda.

Two of the more infamous books within the two codices (Aleph and B) are the Shepherd of Hermes and the Epistle of Barnabas, both long rejected over centuries of time by many bible believing church leaders. These false books are untrustworthy and not to be considered part of the Holy Scriptures from the LORD. However, they are now being revisited and given new credence by these unbelieving liberal theologians and text critics. These books contain blasphemous material, nevertheless they are being reconsidered for addition to a new updated modern bible that can unite mankind under a one world government and religion.

The text critics reason that since these books are 1) part of these "great fourth

^{century manuscripts" and 2) they have been widely accepted among "scholars" as the basis for the Nestle’s-United Bible Society text (NU text) , they should be accorded even more respect and a greater weight as evidence. The NU text is a very different Greek text based on the 1881 revision from Westcott and Hort. It is filled with horrendous changes, deletions and variations from the Received Text (TR) that true believers have had for far longer than a millennium. There are over 36,000 changes total from the traditional Old and New Testaments; the safe and pure stream of the preserved words of the LORD.}

These "new" Greek texts are Alexandrian stream manuscripts. They are the documents that underlie the vast majority of modern bible versions in large measure. The editors tend to hide this fact by stating that their Greek texts were an eclectic range of widely diverse manuscripts but this is just a smokescreen. Their viewpoint is advanced by many churches accepting these new versions; they then conclude; why should these other books in these two codices (Aleph and B) that were "omitted" not be considered as equal in authority and therefore added back into today’s "bibles"?

Along with these additions, they want to discard the more problematic books to Satan’s agenda such as the Revelation. They have no fear of the LORD whatsoever. If they did they would heed the stern warning in Revelation 22: 18 - 19

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

The prophetic character of the Holy Scriptures attests to the truth. It is one of the best evidences for the truth of God’s words in the 66 books we have for the Old and New Testament.

All Christian and Jewish bibles, both pure and corrupt are full of prophetic evidence. These prophecies have a 100% track record of fulfillment and accuracy. This proves the divine origin of the writings (and even in the case of corrupted "bibles" - these unholy perverted "bibles" often have this prophetic information in tact.) However, as we will see, some prophetic teaching has been affected. Fortunately, most is still there as a witness. The Koran, Book of Mormon, and other religious writings do not have these miraculous credentials to certify their claims. In fact the sheer weight of the lack of any prophetic authority or historical evidence has disqualified their claims as being from God. Some of these writings have been relegated to legendary mythology status such as the writings of Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism.

Let’s now see how Satan operates since he can’t produce writings with a miraculous prophetic element.

See Chapter 13 in the next sub page....